About:  Timeline and Postulates
	by Jim West

My Polio/Pesticide Research Timeline

Poliovirus is the major propaganda base for Modern Medicine, for virology and vaccination.  Breaking that base is thus a boon for health, as my work breaks that base, and thereby makes all virology suspect, with poliovirus being one of the all time most funded and most studied supposed viruses.  Vaccines then are also moot. Environmentalism becomes much more important in terms of causation.

My research is independent, as there were no prior studies available at the time, beginning in the late 1980s, and poliovirus propaganda was ubiquitous and authoritative without exception even among dissidents.  The initial evidence stares us all in the face, the general curve of The Great Polio epidemic of the 1950s and the DDT (representative of persistent pesticides) timeline.

My findings re polio toxicology and virology were mind boggling, difficult for even me to continue with, though the evidence was so obvious and plentiful, because major dissidents were quiet.  Even my then hero, Peter Duesberg, dramatically claimed (and still maintains) that the world was saved by Salk Vaccine in his book, "Inventing AIDS".  Maggiore, Perth, and Duesberg would not respond to my emails re pesticides and polio.  Stefan Lanka was the first high profile dissident and virologist to endorse my work after it was published in Townsend Letter (6/2000).  John Scudamore and John Wantling were also early supporters.  The style of my main article is not aggressive.  I merely show the various contradictions of polio and poliovirus with humor, as I was careful, not sure what I was getting into politically.  Nowadays, conspiracy theories are commonplace and it is not uncommon to suspect any virus disease.  That was not so in the late 1980s when I began this work.  My work helped to push the line far beyond HIV skepticism.

My skeptical perspectives were demanded by, and grew out of, my childhood experiences (I was then already well read in science) hearing doctors talking illogically to my parents, and then struggling over the years to save myself from my gullible parents who would take me to exploitive dentists and doctors.  See http://harpub.tk/#IndyRes 

My attitude further developed from Dr. Mendelsohn "Confessions of a Medical Heretic", Herbert Shelton (medical critic) instilled faith in nature, and generally HIV dissident skepticism was helpful. 

I lastly found the arcana (historically buried, unreferenced literature), that is, the polio toxicology works authored by Biskind, Mobbs, and Scobey.  My research enabled finding them.  To be clear, my research is not based on the arcana.  See  http://plag.tk/gen/polio_res_timeline.htm

Poliovirus has not been isolated
Ostrom/Urnovitz, pub 2001, the year after my TLDP article

See http://www.harpub.tk/misc/OstromParalyticpolio.htm

My work appears to have influenced Howard Urnovitz to assert non-isolation for poliovirus.  He told me at Nicholas Regush's office (ABC News) that he read TLDP for ideas.  His stint as a dissident was brief, probably because he wants to remain a working professional microbiologist.  Thanks to Howard for his great efforts.

Industrial dominance

See http://www.harpub.tk/corporat.htm

Perth

Perth gave us simple and rigorous analyses of HIV fundamentals, i.e., the topic of HIV isolation.  In terms of virology, Perth's non-isolation argument is the best dissident science and politic, as Perth arms dissidents with simplicity, which means dissidents need not waste time with the endless spawned claims and arguments, as Perth nips everything about HIV at the root.  Perth is in contrast with those on the Rethinking AIDS ("RA") board of directors such as Peter Duesberg who compromise with the established view of HIV.  Duesberg avoids Perth ever since his early encounters with Perth.  See example of Perth's replies to Duesberg at http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/epreplypd.htm  See Perth's website http://theperthgroup.com and Anthony Brink's pro-Perth site at http://tig.org.za/the_hiv_symposium

Why (philosophy, politics)

Answering, "Why the vast corruption of medical industry?"

1) Farmers use poisons to accelerate production of tissue weight gain.  That is, poisoning, generally, as a form of regulated stress, increases "production".  This method is also functional in human technocratic society, the human farm, as it accelerates human production, its myriad intellectual and physical products. Farm animals are likely unaware of agricultural corruption and injustice.  Such poisoning is only profitable when the consumers are kept blind with lies, such as misdiagnostics via germ pathology.  See http://harpub.tk/toxcredo.htm

2) The medical industry protects technocracy from pollution liabilities by way of misdiagnoses.  For that service, technocracy gives a piece of the action to the orthodox medical industry, as that industry exploits, going beyond mere protection of technocracy.  See flowchart at http://harpub.tk/fc/diag

3) There is a long established relation between opposing stressors – such as intellectual corruption, politics, poisons and human culture, war and human culture – serving an evolutionary function, as a challenge, a filter, similar to the white water challenge for salmon, or the lion challenge for cattle. 

4) There is a long established relation between poisoning and the varied human psychologies and conflicts.  See http://harpub.tk/fc/diag/overvu_peop.htm

Pharma industry exploits people's fear and greed as well as their ignorance or analytical weaknesses.  Like an evil thief exploits the evil in his victims. So the onus is shared by the common person too, though of course there are many innocents due to pharma's false propaganda.  At the crux of the WHY, however, is that pharma offers power or social games that many people want or think they need, and in exchange for the games, people agree on some level, to poison themselves and their closest loved ones. 

Pharma also provides existential rationales for people who are to shallow to understand existence, or people who are damaged by industrial pollution, and need a support team that works in exchange for an agreement for blind ignorance of causation.

5) People are trained and evolved to blindly follow authority, which is symbolized by white coats, resonant voices and 25 cent words. For evidence, see the Milgram Studies, which have been confirmed by subsequent studies.  Milgram found that people will usually kill or severely damage another person if they are told to do so by an authoritative person in a white coat.  I reduce Milgram to "white coat" because Milgram writes that his test subjects did not ask to confirm the authority of the 'authority' in the white coat (a grad assistant) which his study used to ask test subjects to electrocute people (the electrocution was faked but the test subject was unaware of the fakery).  The reduction to "white coat" reaffirms Dr. Mendelsohn's explanation, the religious aspect of Modern Medicine.   This evidence also supports item #4 above.  

Plagiarism and Data Corruption

Dissidents claim to be correcting orthodoxy, and claim orthodoxy abuses truth by refusing to debate dissidents.  Yet high-profile dissidents are guilty of the same behavior as orthodoxy with regard to their treatment of challenges from lower profile dissidents.

High profile dissidents appear to plagiarize, promote plagiaristic and corrupt works, while rationalizing their actions with claims of greater virtue.  They main rationalization usually is that they are saving lives, fighting evil pharma, and therefore their corruption of science and ethics should be a minor concern.  They claim that as dissidents, "we" are all on the same side and that to critique their work is to subvert the dissident movement of which they see themselves as representative.  The topic is explored with examples of disaster at http://plag.tk

High profile dissidents can tend to plagiarize in order to maintain corrupt positions.  They maintain position by compromising with orthodoxy.  They disenfranchise better positions and research to protect their own weak positions. 

Debate among dissidents should not be seen as weakness of dissidentia.  Duesberg should debate Perth further, but he dodges them.  With RA being a Duesberg support group, and Newsweek putting Duesberg on the cover, etc., Duesberg has little motivation to debate Perth, and orthodoxy then has a gatekeeper to protect it from Perth, polio toxicology, etc.  See http://tig.org.za/RA.htm 

Dissidents generally seem to agree with Perth, but support Duesberg for his publicity.  Nevertheless, RA and all dissidents should encourage debate between Duesberg and Perth, or at least refer to such debates already published at VirusMyth, for example.  These debates are a good intro to virology criticism.

Film and Plays, "Product Placement"

My review do not describe the entire surface plots, because conventional reviews do that exclusively.  Usually I just note the medical product placement sub-plots which people then can find when they see the film or play.  Example:  The film, "Knocked Up" at  http://harpub.tk/prodplac/index.htm#Knocked Up (2007).  Another example:  TLDP (Townsend Letter) recently published my review of a Michael Douglas film which is largely about promoting drugs for cardiac problems.  See http://harpub.tk/prodplac/solman.htm

Note

This page was written to support an interview/discussion (3/15/2011) with producer/director, Nicole Zwiren.

Top

© Jim West/HARpub All Rights Reserved